什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 7 7700 或 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2023-01-14.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. 发布于 2022-09-27.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 7700 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 18% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
8 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 8 % higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 AMD Ryzen 7 7700. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 7 7700 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 7 7700 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 15
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 312.600652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 632.530096 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +102.3 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 280.843541 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 555.14446 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +97.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 284.160156 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +103.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 285.219773 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +110.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 317.664112 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | +101.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 261.399837 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | +106.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 313.81982 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 627.290228 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +99.9 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 258.312979 samples/min Submissions: 159 | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | +106.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 323.528403 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 644.599619 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +99.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 252.067854 samples/min Submissions: 61 | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 318.591088 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 639.162595 samples/min Submissions: 82 | +100.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 254.225555 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | +107.6 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 250.533091 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 550.882976 samples/min Submissions: 294 | +119.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 321.732198 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 658.852208 samples/min Submissions: 132 | +104.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 265.944107 samples/min Submissions: 37 | 546.570676 samples/min Submissions: 593 | +105.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | 12206.07765 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO B650M-P (MS-7E27) Duration: 819.264 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 10417.426271 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 95.993 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |