什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 5 7600 或 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2023-01-14.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. 发布于 2022-09-27.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 7600 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 18% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
10 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 12 % higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 AMD Ryzen 5 7600. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 5 7600 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 5 7600 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 209.448798 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 555.14446 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +165.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 225.768313 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +165.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 237.588308 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | +169.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 195.424547 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | +176.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 243.727941 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 627.290228 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +157.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.892298 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | +178.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 237.512418 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 644.599619 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +171.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 186.20697 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | +180.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 237.321783 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 639.162595 samples/min Submissions: 82 | +169.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 188.469939 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | +180.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 257.026064 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 672.672632 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +161.7 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.548542 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 550.882976 samples/min Submissions: 294 | +173.3 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 255.438478 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 658.852208 samples/min Submissions: 132 | +157.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.341111 samples/min Submissions: 99 | 546.570676 samples/min Submissions: 593 | +182.7 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | 6972.431008 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B840M DS3H Duration: 143.422 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 10417.426271 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 95.993 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |