什么是最好的选择 AMD EPYC 9654P 或 Intel Atom E3805? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD EPYC 9654P has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. 发布于 Q4/2022.
Intel Atom E3805 has a base frequency of 1.33 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 3 W. 发布于 Q4/2014.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 80% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
94 more cores
共同立场 AMD EPYC 9654P 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
AMD EPYC 9654P
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Atom E3805 和 AMD EPYC 9654P. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD EPYC 9654P 和 Intel Atom E3805 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD EPYC 9654P 和 Intel Atom E3805, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9654P | 82584.566596 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 10M / 192 threads / linux System RAM: 192 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 01KWRR Duration: 121.088 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |