Qual è la scelta migliore Intel Core i9-13900KF o Intel Core i3-12100F? Quale processore è più veloce?
Abbiamo preparato un confronto per aiutarvi a scegliere il processore migliore. Confrontate le loro specifiche e i loro benchmark.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Rilasciato in Q4/2022.
Intel Core i3-12100F has a base frequency of 3.30 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 58 W. Rilasciato in Q1/2022.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
posto
Più numero di core
20 more cores
4
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i9-13900KF CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i3-12100F CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i3
12
-
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
4x Golden Cove
-
-
-
normal
4
8
Sì
No
3.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
None
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da Intel Core i3-12100F e Intel Core i9-13900KF. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
No
128 GB
-
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
Sì
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP Intel Core i9-13900KF e Intel Core i3-12100F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
58 W
89 W
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da Intel Core i9-13900KF e Intel Core i3-12100F, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Alder Lake S
-
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
5 MB
12 MB
-
Q1/2022
-
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Intel Core i3-12100F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 109.696716 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -78.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 105.417603 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -77.9 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 103.800526 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -78.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 103.238041 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -77.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | 98.290891 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -78.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 103.705581 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -79.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | 101.812902 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -79.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-12100F | 3891.762307 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 6 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Duration: 256.953 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Sulla base dei risultati di diversi benchmark, è possibile stimare con maggiore precisione la differenza di prestazioni tra Intel Core i9-13900KF e Intel Core i3-12100F.
Confrontate i valori dei test sintetici e scegliete il processore migliore!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
