Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core i9-13900KF ou Intel Core i3-12100F? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Nous avons préparé un comparatif pour vous aider à choisir le meilleur processeur. Comparez leurs spécifications et leurs benchmarks.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2022.
Intel Core i3-12100F has a base frequency of 3.30 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 58 W. Sorti en Q1/2022.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
place
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
20 more cores
4
Positions communes Intel Core i9-13900KF CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Positions communes Intel Core i3-12100F CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i3
12
-
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
4x Golden Cove
-
-
-
normal
4
8
Oui
Non
3.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
None
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i3-12100F et Intel Core i9-13900KF. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Non
128 GB
-
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
Oui
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core i9-13900KF et Intel Core i3-12100F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
58 W
89 W
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core i9-13900KF et Intel Core i3-12100F, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Alder Lake S
-
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
5 MB
12 MB
-
Q1/2022
-
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Intel Core i3-12100F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 109.696716 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -78.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 105.417603 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -77.9 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 103.800526 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -78.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 103.238041 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -77.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | 98.290891 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -78.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 103.705581 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -79.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | 101.812902 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -79.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-12100F | 3891.762307 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 6 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Duration: 256.953 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
En vous basant sur les résultats de plusieurs benchmarks, vous pouvez estimer avec plus de précision la différence de performance entre Intel Core i9-13900KF et Intel Core i3-12100F.
Comparez les valeurs des tests synthétiques et choisissez le meilleur processeur !
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
