Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G

Matrox LUMA A310 vs MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q1/2023
Overall score
star star star star star
MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G
MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G has a maximum frequency of 2.310 GHz. Memory size 12 GB. Memory type GDDR6X. Released in Q1/2023.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    10 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 13% better clock speed

    2.310 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    67% more memory

    12 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Battlefield 5
    12 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    22 place
  • Cyberpunk 2077
    24 place
  • GTA 5 Benchmark (Grand Theft Auto V)
    12 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow AD104-400 (Ada Lovelace)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 60
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 7680
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 80
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 240
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 60
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6X
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.313 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 21 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 504 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 192 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.310 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.790 GHz+ 7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 285 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 90 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 16-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310 and MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 3 x 100 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 37 dB
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow MSI Mystic Light
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 338 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 142 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 73 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 4 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 2019 g
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q1/2023
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 799 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow --
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310
107 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
42.85
MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPRIM X 12G
-->

Latest comparisons