Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090

What's the best choice ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC or ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC has a maximum frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2019.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 has a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz. Memory size 24 GB. Memory type GDDR6X. Released in Q4/2022.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2850 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2795 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2789 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2726 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2820 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2561 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    60 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 34% better clock speed

    2.235 GHz left arrow 1.485 GHz
  • More memory

    83% more memory

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    9 place
  • Battlefield 5
    10 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    10 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    7 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    9 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    10 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    8 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    636 place
  • Cyberpunk 2077
    7 place
  • GTA 5 Benchmark (Grand Theft Auto V)
    9 place

Specifications

Technical data
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 left arrow AD102 (Ada Lovelace)
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 128
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 16384
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 512
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 24 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6X
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 21 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    128 GB/s left arrow 1008 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.485 GHz left arrow 2.235 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.785 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.550 GHz+ 1 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.755 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 450 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 450 W-25 %
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 90 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 16-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 80 mm left arrow 3 x 110 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1a
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    3840x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow ASUS Aura Sync
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    200 mm left arrow 348 mm
  • Height
    112 mm left arrow 160 mm
  • Width
    47 mm left arrow 73 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 4 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 1,979 $
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Part-no
    TUF-GTX1650-O4G-GAMING left arrow TUF-RTX4090-24G-GAMING
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.2
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
83.56
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
21 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
185 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
12 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
184 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
28 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
280 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
10 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC
60 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090
-->

Latest comparisons