Samsung Exynos 3475
MediaTek Helio A22
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Samsung Exynos 3475 vs MediaTek Helio A22. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2015
Samsung Exynos 3475
Samsung Exynos 3475
Released
Q2/2020
User rating
star star star star star
MediaTek Helio A22
MediaTek Helio A22

What's the best choice Samsung Exynos 3475 or MediaTek Helio A22? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Samsung Exynos 3475 has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in 2015.

MediaTek Helio A22 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q2/2020.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 3475 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1717 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 54% better clock speed

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 54 % higher specified turbo frequency

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MediaTek Helio A22 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1274 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1250 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1661 place

Specifications

Technical data
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
MediaTek Helio A22 MediaTek Helio A22
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 3400 left arrow MediaTek Helio A22
  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow Mediatek Helio
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 1
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.3 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    1.3 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    1.3 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Core Configuration
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 10
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow 1
  • Generation
    Midgard 3 left arrow -
  • GPU Frequency
    600 MHz left arrow 650 MHz
  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T720 MP1 left arrow PowerVR GE8300
  • GPU Turbo
    600 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 1
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q1/2017
  • Shader
    16 left arrow 0
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 20 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by MediaTek Helio A22 and Samsung Exynos 3475. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    - left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory channels
    0 left arrow 1
  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-400 left arrow LPDDR4X-3200
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Samsung Exynos 3475 and MediaTek Helio A22 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 3475 and MediaTek Helio A22, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Cortex-A7 left arrow Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Release date
    2015 left arrow Q2/2020
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Operating systems
    - left arrow Android

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Samsung Exynos 3475 and MediaTek Helio A22.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

10.000000
Samsung Exynos 3475
41.000000
MediaTek Helio A22

Latest comparisons