Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
AMD A8-6410
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 vs AMD A8-6410. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
Released
Q2/2014
User rating
star star star star star
AMD A8-6410
AMD A8-6410

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 or AMD A8-6410? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 10 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 115 W. Released in Q3/2013.

AMD A8-6410 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q2/2014.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 25% better clock speed

    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • More number of cores

    6 more cores

    10 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 38% higher specified turbo frequency

    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    728 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    302 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    905 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    297 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    514 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    52 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    446 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    134 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    233 place
AMD A8-6410 Reasons to consider
AMD A8-6410
Report a bug
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    15 W left arrow 115 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A8-6410 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    537 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    473 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    983 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    927 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1202 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1156 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1264 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    803 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    746 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    721 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    661 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    959 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
AMD A8-6410 AMD A8-6410
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v2 left arrow AMD A8-6000
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 3
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.5 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    10 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    20 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.3 GHz left arrow 2.4 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
    2.9 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.4 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 2
  • Generation
    - left arrow 6
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 800 MHz
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 2
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 2 GB
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q2/2014
  • Shader
    - left arrow 128
  • Technology
    - left arrow 28 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD A8-6410 and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 and AMD A8-6410 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    115 W left arrow 15 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 and AMD A8-6410, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge EP left arrow Richland (Piledriver)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    25 MB left arrow 2 MB
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q2/2014
  • Socket
    LGA 2011 left arrow AM1
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench R15 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD A8-6410 156 points System: Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN via cyberport.de
CPU / power label: A8-6410
Graphics: Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 800 MHz
RAM: 8 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD A8-6410 49 points System: Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN via cyberport.de
CPU / power label: A8-6410
Graphics: Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 800 MHz
RAM: 8 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 and AMD A8-6410.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

113.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
49.000000
AMD A8-6410
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

1008.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
165.000000
AMD A8-6410
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

551.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
256.000000
AMD A8-6410
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

5876.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
746.000000
AMD A8-6410
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

2670.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
1136.000000
AMD A8-6410
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

48560.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
3297.000000
AMD A8-6410
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

1.380000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
0.600000
AMD A8-6410
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

12.930000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
2.030000
AMD A8-6410
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

15021.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
2501.000000
AMD A8-6410

Latest comparisons