Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs AMD Ryzen 5 3501U — Specifications, performance, tests

Differences
Specifications Benchmarks Testimonials

Differences

Reasons to consider
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Report a bug

More number of cores

12 more cores

16 4
Higher turbo clock speed

Around 30% higher specified turbo frequency

4.8 GHz 3.7 GHz

Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

Report a bug

Higher clock speed

Around 11% better clock speed

2.1 GHz 1.9 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 25 W

Specifications

Technical data

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

Family

Intel Core Ultra Series 3 Ryzen
Segment

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

CPU Cores

16 4
CPU Threads

16 8
E-core Base Clock

1.5 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

4 -
Max. Boost Clock

4.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
P-core Base Clock

1.9 GHz -
Performance Cores

4 -
Base Frequency

- 2.1 GHz
Overclocking

- No

IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

GPU name

Intel Arc B390 GPU Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2500 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 3501U and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

Max. Memory

96 GB -
Memory channels

2 2
Memory type

Up to LPDDR5X 9600 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen 5 3501U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

80 W -
Minimum Assured Power

15 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

25 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

L3-Cache

18 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
Release date

Q1/2026 Q2/2026
Socket

FCBGA2540 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
L2-Cache

- 2 MB
Technology

- 12nm

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 281.404224 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 264.382556 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 244.112063 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	4365 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	509 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	1090 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	124 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	19830 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	2086 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	7749 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	782 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.