Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs AMD Ryzen 5 3501U — Specifiche, prestazioni, test

Differenze
Specifiche Benchmark (test) Testimonianze

Differenze

Motivi da considerare
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Segnala un bug

Più numero di core

12 more cores

16 4
Velocità di clock turbo più alta

Intorno a 30% higher specified turbo frequency

4.8 GHz 3.7 GHz

Motivi da considerare
AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

Segnala un bug

Velocità di clock più alta

Intorno a 11% migliore velocità di clock

2.1 GHz 1.9 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 25 W

Specifiche

Dati tecnici

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

Famiglia e gruppo di CPU

Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.

Serie

Intel Core Ultra Series 3 Ryzen
Segmento

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

Specifiche tecniche della CPU

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Core della CPU

16 4
Threads della CPU

16 8
E-core Base Clock

1.5 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

4 -
Max. Boost Clock

4.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
P-core Base Clock

1.9 GHz -
Performance Cores

4 -
Base Frequency

- 2.1 GHz
Overclock

- No

IGPU

La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.

Nome della GPU

Intel Arc B390 GPU Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2500 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

Specifiche di memoria e PCI

Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da AMD Ryzen 5 3501U e Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.

Max. Memoria

96 GB -
Canali di memoria

2 2
Tipo di memoria

Up to LPDDR5X 9600 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

Consumo di energia

Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP Intel Core Ultra X7 358H e AMD Ryzen 5 3501U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

80 W -
Minimum Assured Power

15 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

25 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

Tecnologie ed estensioni

Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da Intel Core Ultra X7 358H e AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.

L3-Cache

18 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
Data di rilascio

Q1/2026 Q2/2026
Presa

FCBGA2540 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
L2-Cache

- 2 MB
Processo tecnico

- 12nm

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 281.404224 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 264.382556 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 244.112063 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	4365 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	509 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	1090 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	124 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	19830 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	2086 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	7749 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	782 points	System: Khadas Mind Pro via Khadas CPU / power label: Ultra X7 358H 70 W / 45 W Graphics: Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.