What's the best choice Intel Core i9-13900K or Intel Core i7-13700K? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2022.
Intel Core i7-13700K has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2022.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Higher clock speed
Around 12% better clock speed
More number of cores
8 more cores
Common positions Intel Core i9-13900K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions Intel Core i7-13700K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Intel Core i9-13900K
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i9-13900K and Intel Core i7-13700K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i9-13900K and Intel Core i7-13700K, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | Intel Core i7-13700K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 515.8032 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 382.550794 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -25.8 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 521.395074 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 398.424273 samples/min Submissions: 14 | -23.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 508.883555 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 375.301574 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -26.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 543.710413 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 423.126837 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -22.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68 | 382.908151 samples/min Submissions: 103 | -20.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 464.937348 samples/min Submissions: 67 | 367.85735 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -20.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 592.433754 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 456.349692 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -23.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 466.656168 samples/min Submissions: 123 | 355.534876 samples/min Submissions: 75 | -23.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 536.977328 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 447.738754 samples/min Submissions: 69 | -16.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241 | 361.50618 samples/min Submissions: 155 | -24.7 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 487.07809 samples/min Submissions: 173 | 381.80897 samples/min Submissions: 62 | -21.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 596.916385 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 470.556819 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -21.2 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | Intel Core i7-13700K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | 383.010342 samples/min Submissions: 147 | -24.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Core i9-13900K and Intel Core i7-13700K.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.