Intel Celeron G5925
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron G5925 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2020
Intel Celeron G5925
Intel Celeron G5925
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

What's the best choice Intel Celeron G5925 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron G5925 has a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 58 W. Released in Q3/2020.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 180 W. Released in Q3/2017.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    58 W left arrow 180 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron G5925 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1319 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    172 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 8 times more cores

    16 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    289 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    60 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    303 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    59 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    285 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    65 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    547 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    209 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    28 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    169 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    48 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    30 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    17 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    25 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    195 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
    18 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron G5925 Intel Celeron G5925
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron G5000 left arrow AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000
  • Predecessor
    Intel Celeron G5920 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 610 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.35 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.05 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow
  • Shader
    96 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    32 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Intel Celeron G5925. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 64
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    58 W left arrow 180 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron G5925 and Intel Celeron G5925, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Comet Lake S left arrow Whitehaven (Zen)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 1200 left arrow TR4 (SP3r2)
  • Release date
    Q3/2020 left arrow Q3/2017

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons