What's the best choice Elbrus-16S or AMD Epyc 74F3? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Elbrus-16S has a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 130 W. Released in Q4/2021.
AMD Epyc 74F3 has a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 Cores. Power consumption of 240 W. Released in Q1/2021.
Reasons to consider Performance per watt
times less performance per watt
240 W
Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 38% better clock speed
2.0 GHz
More number of cores
About 1.5 times more cores
16
Common positions AMD Epyc 74F3 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Elbrus-16S
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD Epyc
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
3.20 GHz
24
48
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Epyc 74F3 and Elbrus-16S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
DDR4-3200
8
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-16S and AMD Epyc 74F3 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
240 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and Elbrus-16S, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
--
256.00 MB
7 nm
SP3
Q1/2021
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Elbrus-16S and AMD Epyc 74F3.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
