What's the best choice AMD Sempron 3850 or Intel Celeron 6205? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Sempron 3850 has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 25 W. Released in Q2/2014.
Intel Celeron 6205 has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q4/2020.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
2 more cores
Common positions AMD Sempron 3850 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 31% better clock speed
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions Intel Celeron 6205 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
AMD Sempron 3850
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron 6205 and AMD Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Sempron 3850 and Intel Celeron 6205 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Sempron 3850 and Intel Celeron 6205, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.