AMD Ryzen 3 8305G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 3 8305G vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2025-12-04
AMD Ryzen 3 8305G

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 3 8305G
Released
Q4/2024
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 3 8305G or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen 3 8305G has a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in 2025-12-04.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G has a base frequency of 4.3 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q4 2024.

Differences

AMD Ryzen 3 8305G Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 3 8305G
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 3 8305G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 26% better clock speed

    4.3 GHz left arrow 3.4 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    6 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 2 % higher specified turbo frequency

    5 GHz left arrow 4.9 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 3 8305G AMD Ryzen 3 8305G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen left arrow Ryzen PRO
  • Form Factor
    Desktops left arrow Desktops
  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Series
    Ryzen 8000 Series left arrow Ryzen PRO 8000 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.4 GHz left arrow 4.3 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 6
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 12
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz left arrow 5 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow -
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU Frequency
    2600 MHz left arrow 2800 MHz
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon 740M left arrow AMD Radeon 760M
  • Graphics Cores
    4 left arrow 8
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G and AMD Ryzen 3 8305G. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR5 left arrow DDR5
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow PCIe 4.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 3 8305G and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    45-65 W left arrow 45-65 W
  • Default TDP
    65 W left arrow 65 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    95 °C left arrow 95 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 3 8305G and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600G, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Codename
    Phoenix left arrow Phoenix
  • L2-Cache
    4 MB left arrow 6 MB
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 16 MB
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/8000-series/amd-ryzen-3-8305g.html left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen-pro/8000-series/amd-ryzen-5-pro-8600g.html
  • Release date
    2025-12-04 left arrow Q4 2024
  • Socket
    AM5 left arrow AM5
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET left arrow TSMC 4nm FinFET
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons