What's the best choice AMD FX-8300 or Intel Core i5-12400F? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD FX-8300 has a base frequency of 3.3 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 95 W. Released in Q2/2013.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2022.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 32% better clock speed
2.50 GHz
More number of cores
2 more cores
6
Common positions AMD FX-8300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 5 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.2 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
95 W
Common positions Intel Core i5-12400F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD FX-8300
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i5
-
12
Intel Core i5-11400F
Desktop / Server
-
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Golden Cove
2.5 GHz
normal
6
12
Yes
-
No
4.4 GHz
-
4 GHz
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
None
-
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD FX-8300. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
No
128 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
-
5.0 x 20
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-8300 and Intel Core i5-12400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
100 °C
65 W
117 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8300 and Intel Core i5-12400F, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Alder Lake S
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
-
7.5 MB
18 MB
-
-
Q1/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD FX-8300 and Intel Core i5-12400F.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
