What's the best choice AMD FX-6200 or AMD G-T16R? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD FX-6200 has a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q2/2012.
AMD G-T16R has a maximum frequency of 0.62 GHz. 1 Cores. Power consumption of 4 W. Released in Q1/2012.
Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Higher clock speed
Around 84% better clock speed
More number of cores
5 times more cores
Common positions AMD FX-6200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Performance per watt
About 0.03 times less performance per watt
Common positions AMD G-T16R CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD G-T16R and AMD FX-6200. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-6200 and AMD G-T16R to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-6200 and AMD FX-6200, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD FX-6200 and AMD G-T16R.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!