Intel Celeron N3350
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N3350 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2016
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Celeron N3350
Released
Q4/2020
User rating
star star star star star
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

What's the best choice Intel Celeron N3350 or HiSilicon Kirin 9000E? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron N3350 has a base frequency of 1.10 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Released in Q3/2016.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has a base frequency of 2.04 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    283 left arrow place

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N3350 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    338 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    319 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    540 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    491 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    984 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1018 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1176 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1227 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1440 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    795 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    850 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    729 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    778 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    223 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1124 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 85% better clock speed

    2.04 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • More number of cores

    6 more cores

    8 left arrow 2
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 30 % higher specified turbo frequency

    3.13 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 9000E CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    369 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    471 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    76 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    11 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N3350 Intel Celeron N3350
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 9000
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 9
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    - left arrow 1x Cortex-A77
  • B-Core
    - left arrow 3x Cortex-A77
  • Base Frequency
    1.1 GHz left arrow 2.04 GHz
  • C-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A55
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2.4 GHz left arrow 3.13 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    2.4 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.54 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 22
  • Generation
    9 left arrow Vallhall 2
  • GPU Frequency
    200 MHz left arrow 760 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 500 left arrow ARM Mali-G78 MP22
  • GPU Turbo
    650 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 1
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 352
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 5 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by HiSilicon Kirin 9000E and Intel Celeron N3350. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    8 GB left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 4
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866DDR4-2400 left arrow LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron N3350 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    6 W left arrow -
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N3350 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Braswell left arrow Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    2 MB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Socket
    BGA 1296 left arrow -
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron N3350 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000E.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

293.000000
Intel Celeron N3350
1063.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

539.000000
Intel Celeron N3350
3767.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

125.000000
Intel Celeron N3350
2137.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Latest comparisons