Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron J4025
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron J4025. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N3160
Released
Q4/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron J4025

What's the best choice Intel Celeron N3160 or Intel Celeron J4025? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron N3160 has a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 6 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Intel Celeron J4025 has a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 10 W. Released in Q4/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1483 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    6 W left arrow 10 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N3160 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1043 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    998 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1417 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1434 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1480 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    839 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    775 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    804 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    738 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    307 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1224 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    290 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    300 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1737 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 20% better clock speed

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 23 % better overclocked clock speed

    2.90 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J4025 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    867 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    954 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1148 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1334 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1478 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N3160 Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron J4025 Intel Celeron J4025
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 9
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    1.60 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.24 GHz left arrow 2.90 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 400 left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 600
  • GPU frequency
    0.32 GHz left arrow 0.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.64 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 9.5
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q4/2017
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR4-2400
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow 6
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Celeron J4025 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    6 W left arrow 10 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Celeron N3160, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Braswell left arrow Gemini Lake
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1090
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q4/2019

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Celeron J4025.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
38
Intel Celeron N3160
85
Intel Celeron J4025
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
136
Intel Celeron N3160
160
Intel Celeron J4025
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
210
Intel Celeron N3160
488
Intel Celeron J4025
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
709
Intel Celeron N3160
952
Intel Celeron J4025
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
134
Intel Celeron N3160
134
Intel Celeron J4025

Latest comparisons