HiSilicon Kirin 620
HiSilicon Kirin 930
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2015
HiSilicon Kirin 620
HiSilicon Kirin 620
Released
Q1/2015
User rating
star star star star star
HiSilicon Kirin 930
HiSilicon Kirin 930

What's the best choice HiSilicon Kirin 620 or HiSilicon Kirin 930? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

HiSilicon Kirin 620 has a base frequency of 1.20 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q1/2015.

HiSilicon Kirin 930 has a base frequency of 1.50 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q1/2015.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 620 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1293 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1234 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1682 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 25% better clock speed

    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    8 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 67 % higher specified turbo frequency

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 930 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1566 place

Specifications

Technical data
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
HiSilicon Kirin 930 HiSilicon Kirin 930
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 620 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 930
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 3
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
  • B-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
  • Base Frequency
    1.2 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    1.2 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    1.2 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    - left arrow 2 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    0 left arrow 11
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Generation
    Utgard left arrow Midgard 2
  • GPU Frequency
    530 MHz left arrow 600 MHz
  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-450 MP4 left arrow ARM Mali-T628 MP4
  • GPU Turbo
    530 MHz left arrow 600 MHz
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 1
  • Release date
    2012 left arrow Q4/2012
  • Shader
    64 left arrow 64
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 32nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by HiSilicon Kirin 930 and HiSilicon Kirin 620. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    LPDDR3 left arrow LPDDR3-1600
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP HiSilicon Kirin 620 and HiSilicon Kirin 930 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by HiSilicon Kirin 620 and HiSilicon Kirin 930, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q1/2015
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between HiSilicon Kirin 620 and HiSilicon Kirin 930.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

32.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 620
77.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 930

Latest comparisons