AMD FX-6200
AMD G-T16R
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-6200 vs AMD G-T16R. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2012
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-6200
Released
Q1/2012
User rating
star star star star star
AMD G-T16R
AMD G-T16R

What's the best choice AMD FX-6200 or AMD G-T16R? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD FX-6200 has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q2/2012.

AMD G-T16R has a base frequency of 0.62 GHz. 1 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 4 W. Released in Q1/2012.

Differences

AMD FX-6200 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-6200
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 513% better clock speed

    3.80 GHz left arrow 0.62 GHz
  • More number of cores

    5 more cores

    6 left arrow 1

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-6200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    507 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    394 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    931 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    766 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    626 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    435 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    574 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    414 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    594 place
AMD G-T16R Reasons to consider
AMD G-T16R
Report a bug
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    4 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD G-T16R CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1639 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD FX-6100/6200 left arrow AMD G
  • Family
    FX-Series left arrow AMD G
  • Form Factor
    Desktops left arrow -
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Series
    FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.8 GHz left arrow 0.62 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    6 left arrow 1
  • CPU Threads
    6 left arrow 1
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.1 GHz left arrow -
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    4.1 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)
    4.1 GHz left arrow -
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 11
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 1
  • Generation
    - left arrow 3
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 280 MHz
  • GPU name
    None left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6250
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 2
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 1 GB
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q4/2010
  • Shader
    - left arrow 80
  • Technology
    - left arrow 40 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD G-T16R and AMD FX-6200. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • System Memory Specification
    1866 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-6200 and AMD G-T16R Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Default TDP
    125 W left arrow -
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    61.1 °C left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    125 W left arrow 4 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-6200 and AMD G-T16R, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Zambezi (Bulldozer) left arrow Ontario (Bobcat)
  • Codename
    FX Legacy left arrow -
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE3, SSE4a
  • L1-Cache
    0.28125 MB left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    6 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Manufacturer product ID (boxed)
    FD6200FRGUBOX left arrow -
  • Manufacturer product ID (tray)
    FD6200FRW6KGU left arrow -
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/processors.html left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q2/2012 left arrow Q1/2012
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow -
  • Technology
    32nm SOI left arrow 40 nm
  • Verification scope
    Explicit manufacturer fields refreshed; other original historical fields retained, not all reverified. Partial composite conflicts are preserved. left arrow -
  • Verified on
    2026-10-01 left arrow -
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons