What's the best choice AMD Epyc 72F3 or Elbrus-16S? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD Epyc 72F3 has a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 180 W. Released in Q1/2021.
Elbrus-16S has a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 130 W. Released in Q4/2021.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 46% better clock speed
2.0 GHz
Common positions AMD Epyc 72F3 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
About 2 times more cores
8
Performance per watt
About 0.72 times less performance per watt
180 W
Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD Epyc 72F3
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Desktop
Elbrus
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
2.0 GHz
16
16
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Elbrus-16S and AMD Epyc 72F3. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
DDR4-3200
Yes
8
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Epyc 72F3 and Elbrus-16S to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
130 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Epyc 72F3 and AMD Epyc 72F3, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
16 MB
32 MB
16 nm
HFCBGA 4804
Q2/2022
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Epyc 72F3 and Elbrus-16S.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
