什么是最好的选择 Intel Xeon w5-2465X 或 AMD EPYC 9754? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Xeon w5-2465X has a base frequency of 3.10 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 200 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
AMD EPYC 9754 has a base frequency of 2.25 GHz. 128 / 256 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. 发布于 Q2/2023.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 38% 更好的时钟速度
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 52% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
112 more cores
Intel Xeon w5-2465X
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD EPYC 9754 和 Intel Xeon w5-2465X. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Xeon w5-2465X 和 AMD EPYC 9754 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Xeon w5-2465X 和 AMD EPYC 9754, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 67230.506515 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 10M / 128 threads / windows System RAM: 192 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N/NT Duration: 148.742 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |