Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i7-13850HX

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i9-13900K

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

7 地点
更多的核心数量

4 more cores

24 20

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

2 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

11 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

7 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

10 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

9 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

15 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

446 place

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-13850HX

报告一个错误

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

55 W 125 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i7-13850HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

362 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i7-13850HX

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 13000 Intel Core i 13000H
系列

Intel Core i9 Intel Core i7
一代人

13 13
过去的模式

Intel Core i9-12900K Intel Core i7-12850HX
分段

Desktop / Server Mobile
Successor

没有 -

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

8x Raptor Cove / 3.80 GHz (5.70 GHz) 8x Raptor Cove
B-Core

16x Gracemont / 3.00 GHz (4.20 GHz) 12x Gracemont
Base Frequency

3.8 GHz -
核心架构

hybrid hybrid (big.LITTLE)
CPU核数

24 20
CPU线程

32 28
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

没有没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

没有 -
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)

没有涡轮增压 -
A-Core Frequency

- 2.10 GHz (5.30 GHz)
B-Core Frequency

- 1.50 GHz (3.80 GHz)

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 12
执行单位

32 32
一代人

12 13
GPU Frequency

400 MHz 400 MHz
GPU名称

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32 Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (32 EU)
GPU Turbo

1450 MHz 1600 MHz
Max. displays

4 3
Max. GPU Memory

16 GB 64 GB
发布日期

Q4/2022 Q1/2023
着色器

256 256
技术过程

10 nm 10 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

Decode Decode
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
JPEG

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
VP8

Decode Decode / Encode
VP9

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-13850HX 和 Intel Core i9-13900K. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

是是
最大内存

128 GB 128 GB
Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
记忆通道

2 2 (Dual Channel)
存储器类型

DDR5-5600 DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
PCIe

5.0 x 20 5.0 x 20

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Intel Core i7-13850HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

125 W -
TDP (PL2)

241 W 157 W
TDP down

没有 45 W
TDP up

没有 86 W
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

- 55 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Intel Core i7-13850HX, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Raptor Lake S Raptor Lake H
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
L2-Cache

32 MB 24 MB
L2-Cache

36 MB 30 MB
发布日期

Q4/2022 Q1/2023
插座

LGA 1700 BGA 1744
技术过程

10 nm 10 nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Chip design

- Monolithic
规格

- Technical data sheet
Operating systems

- Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 5

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core i9-13900K	Intel Core i7-13850HX	Result difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68	292.206874 samples/min Submissions: 12	-39.6 %
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows	464.937348 samples/min Submissions: 67	299.154137 samples/min Submissions: 16	-35.7 %
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows	466.656168 samples/min Submissions: 123	233.273109 samples/min Submissions: 5	-50.0 %
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows	480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241	221.633648 samples/min Submissions: 6	-53.8 %
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows	506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251	284.528698 samples/min Submissions: 6	-43.8 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i9-13900K

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 596.916385 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 569.007612 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 487.07809 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 536.977328 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 592.433754 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 523.732424 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 543.710413 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 508.883555 samples/min

More results: 2

Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 521.395074 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 513.095561 samples/min

Intel Core i7-13850HX

Results with primary test sources

Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.

Model	Test	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / multi-core	6191 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / single-core	327 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / multi-core	15181 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / single-core	828 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / multi-core	40103 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / single-core	2267 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	9028.644277 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 28 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i7-13850HX	9627.140835 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 28 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 0GVYHR Duration: 103.873 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Intel Core i7-13850HX.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU的性能--游戏中的内部GPU

Higher values are better in this metric.

741.000000

Intel Core i9-13900K

819.000000

Intel Core i7-13850HX