Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i9-13900K

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

7 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 19% 更好的时钟速度

3.80 GHz 3.2 GHz
更多的核心数量

18 more cores

24 6

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

2 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

11 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

7 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

10 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

9 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

15 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

446 place

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 5 1600

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

185 地点
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

65 W 125 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

285 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

209 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

363 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

218 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

436 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

276 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

524 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

355 place
Monero Hashrate kH/s

90 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

75 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

197 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

166 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

187 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

144 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

304 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 13000 AMD Ryzen 1000
系列

Intel Core i9 Ryzen
一代人

13 1
过去的模式

Intel Core i9-12900K -
分段

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Successor

没有 -
Form Factor

- Desktops / Boxed Processor
Series

- Ryzen 1000 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

8x Raptor Cove / 3.80 GHz (5.70 GHz) -
B-Core

16x Gracemont / 3.00 GHz (4.20 GHz) -
Base Frequency

3.8 GHz 3.2 GHz
核心架构

hybrid normal
CPU核数

24 6
CPU线程

32 12
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

没有是
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

没有 3.6 GHz
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)

没有涡轮增压 -
Max. Boost Clock

- 3.6 GHz
Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)

- 3.4 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 -
执行单位

32 -
一代人

12 -
GPU Frequency

400 MHz -
GPU名称

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32 None
GPU Turbo

1450 MHz -
Max. displays

4 -
Max. GPU Memory

16 GB -
发布日期

Q4/2022 -
着色器

256 -
技术过程

10 nm -

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

Decode 没有
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
JPEG

Decode / Encode 没有
VC-1

Decode 没有
VP8

Decode 没有
VP9

Decode / Encode 没有

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 和 Intel Core i9-13900K. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

是是
最大内存

128 GB -
Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s -
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR5-5600 DDR4
PCIe

5.0 x 20 PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe通道

- 20
PCIe版本

- 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2667

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 95 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

125 W 65 W
TDP (PL2)

241 W -
TDP down

没有 -
TDP up

没有 -
Default TDP

- 65 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 AMD Ryzen 5 1600, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Raptor Lake S Summit Ridge (Zen)
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache

32 MB 3 MB
L2-Cache

36 MB 16 MB
发布日期

Q4/2022 2017-04-11
插座

LGA 1700 AM4
技术过程

10 nm 14nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d AMD-V, SVM
Codename

- Pinnacle Ridge
L1-Cache

- 0.5625 MB
Manufacturer product ID (boxed)

- YD1600BBAEBOX
Manufacturer product ID (MPK)

- YD1600BBAEMPK
Manufacturer product ID (tray)

- YD1600BBM6IAE
Operating systems

- Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i9-13900K

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 596.916385 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 506.012269 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 569.007612 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 487.07809 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 536.977328 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 480.196647 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 592.433754 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 466.656168 samples/min

More results: 7

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 523.732424 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 464.937348 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 543.710413 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 483.50998 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 508.883555 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 521.395074 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 511.097214 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Results with primary test sources

Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.

Model	Test	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / multi-core	6191 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / single-core	327 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / multi-core	15181 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / single-core	828 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / multi-core	40103 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / single-core	2267 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	9028.644277 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 AMD Ryzen 5 1600.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 SC是一个适用于macOs和Windows的跨平台测试套件，使用一个CPU核心，没有超线性。

Higher values are better in this metric.

2267.000000

Intel Core i9-13900K

900.000000

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 MC是一个跨平台测试套件，适用于macOs和Windows，采用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

38460.000000