Intel Core i7-8700K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-8700K

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

142 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 6% 更好的时钟速度

3.70 GHz 3.5 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

95 W 105 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i7-8700K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

178 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

163 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

132 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

157 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

80 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

211 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

211 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

259 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

587 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

55 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

12 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

126 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

8 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

109 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

9 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

211 place

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

34 地点
更多的核心数量

10 more cores

16 6

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

120 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

38 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

84 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

29 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

50 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

20 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

197 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

49 place
Monero Hashrate kH/s

19 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

8 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

37 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 8000 AMD Ryzen 3000
系列

Intel Core i7 Ryzen
一代人

8 3
过去的模式

Intel Core i7-7700K -
分段

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Successor

Intel Core i7-9700KF AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Form Factor

- Desktops / Boxed Processor
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

3.7 GHz 3.5 GHz
核心架构

normal normal
CPU核数

6 16
CPU线程

12 32
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

是是
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4.7 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)

4.3 GHz -
Max. Boost Clock

- 4.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)

- 4 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 -
执行单位

24 -
一代人

9.5 -
GPU Frequency

350 MHz -
GPU名称

Intel UHD Graphics 630 None
GPU Turbo

1200 MHz -
Max. displays

3 -
Max. GPU Memory

64 GB -
发布日期

Q4/2017 -
着色器

192 -
技术过程

14 nm -

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

没有没有
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
JPEG

Decode / Encode 没有
VC-1

Decode 没有
VP8

Decode / Encode 没有
VP9

Decode / Encode 没有

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 和 Intel Core i7-8700K. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

没有是
最大内存

128 GB 128 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR4-2666 DDR4
PCIe通道

16 20
PCIe版本

3.0 4.0
PCIe

- PCIe 4.0

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-8700K 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

- 95 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

95 W 105 W
TDP (PL2)

- 142 W
Default TDP

- 105 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-8700K 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Coffee Lake S Matisse (Zen 2)
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache

- 8 MB
L2-Cache

12 MB 64 MB
发布日期

Q4/2017 2019-07-07
插座

LGA 1151-2 AM4
技术过程

14 nm TSMC 7nm FinFET
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d AMD-V, SVM
Codename

- Matisse
L1-Cache

- 1 MB
Manufacturer product ID (boxed)

- 100-100000051WOF
Manufacturer product ID (tray)

- 100-000000051
Operating systems

- Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Thermal Solution (PIB)

- Cooler Not Included, Liquid Cooling Recommended

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 347.032225 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 463.472754 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 343.483159 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 377.646335 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 329.549583 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 385.410161 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 320.687592 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 323.132971 samples/min

More results: 3

Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 349.707646 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux 391.034217 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 356.232453 samples/min

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X	17352.073573 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Duration: 57.63 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i7-8700K 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 SC是一个适用于macOs和Windows的跨平台测试套件，使用一个CPU核心，没有超线性。

Higher values are better in this metric.

1209.000000

Intel Core i7-8700K

1371.000000

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 MC是一个跨平台测试套件，适用于macOs和Windows，采用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

8960.000000