什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-13700F 或 Intel Core i3-13100? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-13700F has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz (5.20 GHz). 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i3-13100 has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz (4.80 GHz). 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 60 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更多的核心数量
12 more cores
4
共同立场 Intel Core i7-13700F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
共同立场 Intel Core i3-13100 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i7-13700F
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i3
13
Intel Core i3-12100
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
4x Golden Cove
3.4 GHz
-
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
4
8
是
没有
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
Intel UHD Graphics 770
12
32
11
300 MHz
1350 MHz
3
64 GB
Q4/2021
256
10 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i3-13100 和 Intel Core i7-13700F. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
是
128 GB
89.6 GB/s
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-13700F 和 Intel Core i3-13100 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
60 W
117 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-13700F 和 Intel Core i3-13100, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Alder Lake S Refresh
Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
10 MB
12 MB
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2023
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 1
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-13700F | Intel Core i3-13100 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 266.833578 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 87.12628 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -67.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-13100 | 4084.433407 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 6 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 244.832 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13700F | 8973.680196 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M AORUS PRO AX Duration: 111.437 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
