什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-13650HX 或 Intel Core i7-12700? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-13650HX has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (4.90 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i7-12700 has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
2 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i7-13650HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-13650HX
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-12700 和 Intel Core i7-13650HX. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-13650HX 和 Intel Core i7-12700 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-13650HX 和 Intel Core i7-12700, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-13650HX | Intel Core i7-12700 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 223.594091 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 261.19329 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +16.8 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 236.660801 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 236.400373 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -0.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 207.545806 samples/min Submissions: 79 | 222.861879 samples/min Submissions: 25 | +7.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 244.514989 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 235.615566 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -3.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.969041 samples/min Submissions: 37 | 214.261564 samples/min Submissions: 12 | +0.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 231.369695 samples/min Submissions: 52 | 223.046296 samples/min Submissions: 25 | -3.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 256.110727 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 212.631414 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -17.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 238.829135 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 238.772898 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 0.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700 | 6523.540195 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 0Y08K8 Duration: 153.291 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13650HX | 6617.827103 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / G614JV Duration: 151.107 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |