什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-1255U 或 Intel Core i5-13600K? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-1255U has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 10 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5-13600K has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2022.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i7-1255U 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 100% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
4 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 9 % higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13600K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i7-1255U
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-13600K 和 Intel Core i7-1255U. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-1255U 和 Intel Core i5-13600K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-1255U 和 Intel Core i5-13600K, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-1255U | Intel Core i5-13600K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 72.500587 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 312.8135 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +331.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 71.046234 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 322.207228 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +353.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 73.828397 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 302.183788 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +309.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 72.326994 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 282.092469 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +290.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 72.096635 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 288.051585 samples/min Submissions: 27 | +299.5 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 78.804508 samples/min Submissions: 60 | 280.268891 samples/min Submissions: 77 | +255.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 76.175019 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 302.993163 samples/min Submissions: 145 | +297.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13600K | 7629.627369 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / Z690 UD DDR4 Duration: 131.068 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1255U | 2858.106447 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 8 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / 21E60050UK Duration: 349.882 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |