Intel Core i5-2500k vs Intel Core i9-13900K

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i5-2500k

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

252 地点
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

95 W 125 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i5-2500k 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

314 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

292 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

454 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

388 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

637 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

573 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

613 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

658 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

1250 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

158 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

419 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

387 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

354 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

368 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

177 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

587 place

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i9-13900K

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

7 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 15% 更好的时钟速度

3.80 GHz 3.30 GHz
更多的核心数量

20 more cores

24 4

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

2 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

11 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

7 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

10 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

9 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

15 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

446 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i5-2500k

Intel Core i9-13900K

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 2000 Intel Core i 13000
系列

Intel Core i5 Intel Core i9
一代人

2 13
过去的模式

- Intel Core i9-12900K
分段

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Successor

- 没有

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

- 8x Raptor Cove / 3.80 GHz (5.70 GHz)
B-Core

- 16x Gracemont / 3.00 GHz (4.20 GHz)
Base Frequency

3.3 GHz 3.8 GHz
核心架构

normal hybrid
CPU核数

4 24
CPU线程

4 32
Hyperthreading / SMT

没有是
超频

是没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

3.7 GHz 没有
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

3.7 GHz -
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)

- 没有涡轮增压

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

10.1 12
执行单位

12 32
一代人

6 12
GPU Frequency

850 MHz 400 MHz
GPU名称

Intel HD Graphics 3000 Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32
GPU Turbo

1100 MHz 1450 MHz
Max. displays

2 4
Max. GPU Memory

- 16 GB
发布日期

Q1/2011 Q4/2022
着色器

96 256
技术过程

32 nm 10 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

没有 Decode
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

没有 Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

没有 Decode / Encode
JPEG

没有 Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
VP8

没有 Decode
VP9

没有 Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Intel Core i5-2500k. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

没有是
最大内存

32 GB 128 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

- DDR5-5600
PCIe通道

16 -
PCIe版本

2.0 -
Memory Bandwidth

- 89.6 GB/s
PCIe

- 5.0 x 20

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-2500k 和 Intel Core i9-13900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

- 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

95 W 125 W
TDP (PL2)

- 241 W
TDP down

- 没有
TDP up

- 没有

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-2500k 和 Intel Core i9-13900K, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Sandy Bridge S Raptor Lake S
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
L2-Cache

- 32 MB
L2-Cache

6 MB 36 MB
发布日期

Q1/2011 Q4/2022
插座

LGA 1155 LGA 1700
技术过程

32 nm 10 nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i5-2500k

Intel Core i9-13900K

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 596.916385 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 506.012269 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 569.007612 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 487.07809 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 536.977328 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 480.196647 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 592.433754 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 466.656168 samples/min

More results: 7

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 523.732424 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 464.937348 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 543.710413 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 483.50998 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 508.883555 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 521.395074 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 513.095561 samples/min

Results with primary test sources

Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.

Model	Test	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / multi-core	6191 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / single-core	327 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / multi-core	15181 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / single-core	828 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / multi-core	40103 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / single-core	2267 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	9028.644277 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-2500k 和 Intel Core i9-13900K.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 SC是一个适用于macOs和Windows的跨平台测试套件，使用一个CPU核心，没有超线性。

Higher values are better in this metric.

697.000000

Intel Core i5-2500k

2267.000000

Intel Core i9-13900K

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 MC是一个跨平台测试套件，适用于macOs和Windows，采用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

2450.000000