什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-1235U 或 Intel Core i5-13500? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i5-1235U has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 10 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5-13500 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (5.20 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i5-1235U 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
4 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 9 % higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13500 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-1235U
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-13500 和 Intel Core i5-1235U. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-1235U 和 Intel Core i5-13500 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-1235U 和 Intel Core i5-13500, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-1235U | Intel Core i5-13500 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 62.248659 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 261.585647 samples/min Submissions: 20 | +320.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 63.495331 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 255.149947 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +301.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 68.864953 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 215.962394 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +213.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 62.385861 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 248.528431 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +298.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 69.891565 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 265.346667 samples/min Submissions: 20 | +279.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 69.294435 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 242.080704 samples/min Submissions: 75 | +249.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500 | 7227.73136 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MAG B760 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D96) Duration: 138.356 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U | 1042.451763 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 959.277 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-1235U 和 Intel Core i5-13500.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.