什么是最好的选择 Elbrus-8SB 或 Baikal-M? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Elbrus-8SB has a base frequency of 1.5 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 90 W. 发布于 Q1/2020.
Baikal-M has a base frequency of 1.5 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 30 W. 发布于 Q3/2019.
需要考虑的原因 共同立场 Elbrus-8SB 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
90 W
共同立场 Baikal-M 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Elbrus-8SB
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Baikal-M
Baikal
Desktop
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
1.5 GHz
8
8
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
0,7 GHz
Arm Mali-T628
8
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Baikal-M 和 Elbrus-8SB. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
8
DDR3/DDR4-2400
是
128
3
比较TDP的要求 Elbrus-8SB 和 Baikal-M Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
30 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Elbrus-8SB 和 Baikal-M, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
-
-
8 MB
Q3/2019
FCBGA-1521
28 nm
CortexA57
4x1024 KB
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Elbrus-8SB 和 Baikal-M.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
