什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 或 Intel Core i7-13700F? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. 发布于 2022-09-27.
Intel Core i7-13700F has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz (5.20 GHz). 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
170 W
共同立场 Intel Core i7-13700F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i7
-
13
Intel Core i7-12700F
Desktop / Server
-
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
-
16
24
是
-
没有
-
-
8x Raptor Cove
2.10 GHz (5.20 GHz)
8x Gracemont
2.10 GHz (4.10 GHz)
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
-
None
-
-
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-13700F 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
是
128 GB
89.6 GB/s
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
是
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 Intel Core i7-13700F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
100 °C
65 W
202 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 Intel Core i7-13700F, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Raptor Lake S
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
24 MB
30 MB
Q1/2023
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel Core i7-13700F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | 274.452336 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -49.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | 277.892173 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -47.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | 274.196692 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -47.5 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | 266.833578 samples/min Submissions: 18 | -49.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 550.882976 samples/min Submissions: 294 | 269.294235 samples/min Submissions: 14 | -51.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 546.570676 samples/min Submissions: 593 | 309.536459 samples/min Submissions: 38 | -43.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 10417.426271 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 95.993 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13700F | 8973.680196 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M AORUS PRO AX Duration: 111.437 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 Intel Core i7-13700F.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
