AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

24 地点
更多的核心数量

12 more cores

16 4
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 23% higher specified turbo frequency

4.9 GHz 4 GHz

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

50 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

25 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

32 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

23 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

10 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

12 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

97 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

32 place
Monero Hashrate kH/s

18 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

15 place

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

187 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 12% 更好的时钟速度

3.8 GHz 3.4 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

65 W 105 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

193 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

215 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

161 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

230 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

160 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

300 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

281 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

347 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

215 place

规格

技术数据

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

AMD Ryzen 5000 AMD Ryzen 4000G
系列

Ryzen Ryzen PRO
Form Factor

Desktops / Boxed Processor Desktops
一代人

4 3
过去的模式

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X -
分段

Desktop Desktop / Server
Series

Ryzen 5000 Series Ryzen PRO 4000 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
核心架构

normal normal
CPU核数

16 4
CPU线程

32 8
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
Max. Boost Clock

4.9 GHz 4 GHz
超频

是没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4.9 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)

4.2 GHz -
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

- 4 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

GPU名称

None Radeon Graphics
DirectX Version

- 12
执行单位

- 6
一代人

- 9
GPU Frequency

- 1700 MHz
GPU Turbo

- 没有涡轮增压
Graphics Cores

- 6
Max. displays

- 3
Max. GPU Memory

- 2 GB
发布日期

- Q1/2020
着色器

- 384
技术过程

- 7 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

没有没有
H.264 / AVC

没有 Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

没有 Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

没有 Decode / Encode
JPEG

没有 Decode / Encode
VC-1

没有 Decode
VP8

没有 Decode / Encode
VP9

没有 Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 和 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

是是
最大内存

128 GB 64 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR4 DDR4
PCIe

PCIe 4.0 PCIe 3.0
PCIe通道

20 12
PCIe版本

4.0 3.0
System Memory Specification

3200 3200

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 和 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Default TDP

105 W 65 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

90 °C 95 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

105 W 65 W
TDP (PL2)

142 W -
TDP down

- 45 W
Configurable TDP

- 45-65 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 和 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Vermeer (Zen 3) Renoir (Zen 2)
Codename

Vermeer Renoir
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache

8 MB 2 MB
L2-Cache

64 MB 4 MB
发布日期

2020-11-05 2020-07-21
插座

AM4 AM4
技术过程

TSMC 7nm FinFET TSMC 7nm FinFET
虚拟化

AMD-V, SVM AMD-V, SVM
L1-Cache

- 0.25 MB
Manufacturer product ID (MPK)

- 100-100000148MPK
Manufacturer product ID (tray)

- 100-000000148
Operating systems

- Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Thermal Solution (MPK)

- AMD Wraith Stealth

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 485.266435 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 373.225213 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 488.996915 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 387.130994 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 450.596613 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 359.342965 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 466.729065 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 363.828367 samples/min

More results: 10

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 437.509276 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 366.710742 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 450.340522 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 377.12565 samples/min
Blender 5.0.0 / CPU / Windows 379.714418 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 400.34828 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux 455.192491 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 403.442035 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 436.338265 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 407.052862 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / single core with SMT

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	511 points	System: 5950X, RX 7900 GRE, 32 GB CPU / power label: 5950X, RX 7900 GRE, 32 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	1625 points	System: Ryzen 9 5950X, 64 GB CPU / power label: Ryzen 9 5950X, 64 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	102 points	System: Ryzen 9 5950X, 64 GB CPU / power label: Ryzen 9 5950X, 64 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.20.0 / 1M / 2 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G	1432.909049 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.20.0 / 1M / 2 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B550M-A AC Duration: 697.881 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	28782 points	System: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	1684 points	System: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	10435 points	System: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @Stock CPU / power label: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X	649 points	System: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @Stock CPU / power label: CB: Ryzen 9 5950X @Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 和 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 SC是一个适用于macOs和Windows的跨平台测试套件，使用一个CPU核心，没有超线性。

Higher values are better in this metric.

1639.000000

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

1162.000000

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 MC是一个跨平台测试套件，适用于macOs和Windows，采用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

28641.000000