AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i7-9750H

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

报告一个错误

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

35 W 45 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

340 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

272 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

442 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

363 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

609 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

564 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

120 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

209 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

188 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

454 place

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-9750H

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

177 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 13% 更好的时钟速度

2.60 GHz 2.3 GHz
更多的核心数量

2 more cores

6 4
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 13 % higher specified turbo frequency

4.50 GHz 4 GHz

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i7-9750H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

213 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

198 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

218 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

204 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

169 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

250 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

273 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

342 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

667 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

72 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

267 place

规格

技术数据

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel Core i7-9750H

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

AMD Ryzen 3000H Intel Core i 9000H
系列

Ryzen Intel Core i7
Form Factor

Laptops / Desktops -
一代人

2 9
分段

Mobile Mobile
Series

Ryzen 3000 Series -

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

2.3 GHz 2.6 GHz
核心架构

normal normal
CPU核数

4 6
CPU线程

8 12
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
Max. Boost Clock

4 GHz -
超频

没有没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4 GHz 4.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

3.5 GHz -
Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)

- 3.2 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 12
执行单位

10 24
一代人

8 9.5
GPU Frequency

1400 MHz 350 MHz
GPU名称

Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Turbo

没有涡轮增压 1150 MHz
Graphics Cores

10 -
Max. displays

3 3
Max. GPU Memory

2 GB 64 GB
发布日期

Q1/2018 Q4/2017
着色器

640 192
技术过程

14 nm 14 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

没有没有
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
JPEG

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
VP8

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
VP9

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-9750H 和 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

是没有
最大内存

32 GB 128 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR4-2400 DDR4-2666LPDDR3-2133
PCIe

PCIe 3.0 -
PCIe通道

12 16
PCIe版本

3.0 3.0
System Memory Specification

2400 -

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 和 Intel Core i7-9750H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Configurable TDP

12-35 W -
Default TDP

35 W -
Maximum Operating Temperature

105 °C 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

35 W 45 W
TDP down

12 W 35 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 和 Intel Core i7-9750H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Picasso (Zen+) Coffee Lake H Refresh
Codename

Picasso -
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
L1-Cache

0.375 MB -
L2-Cache

2 MB -
L2-Cache

4 MB 12 MB
Manufacturer product ID (tray)

YM3700C4T4MFG -
Operating systems

Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit -
发布日期

Q1/2019 Q2/2019
插座

FP5 BGA 1440
技术过程

12nm 14 nm
虚拟化

AMD-V, SVM VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3897 points	System: Beelink SER3 via Beelink CPU / power label: R7 3750H 21 W / 18 W Graphics: Vega 10 ? / 1200 MHz 2 GB RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	971 points	System: Beelink SER3 via Beelink CPU / power label: R7 3750H 21 W / 18 W Graphics: Vega 10 ? / 1200 MHz 2 GB RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1514 points	System: Beelink SER3 via Beelink CPU / power label: R7 3750H 21 W / 18 W Graphics: Vega 10 ? / 1200 MHz 2 GB RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	377 points	System: Beelink SER3 via Beelink CPU / power label: R7 3750H 21 W / 18 W Graphics: Vega 10 ? / 1200 MHz 2 GB RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	680 points	System: Beelink SER3 via Beelink CPU / power label: R7 3750H 21 W / 18 W Graphics: Vega 10 ? / 1200 MHz 2 GB RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	146 points	System: Beelink SER3 via Beelink CPU / power label: R7 3750H 21 W / 18 W Graphics: Vega 10 ? / 1200 MHz 2 GB RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 和 Intel Core i7-9750H.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 SC是一个高负荷的CPU测试，适用于台式机或笔记本电脑上的长时间任务，使用一个CPU核心，没有超负荷的情况。

Higher values are better in this metric.

367.000000

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

441.000000

Intel Core i7-9750H

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 MC是一个高负荷的CPU测试，用于测试台式机或笔记本电脑上的长任务，使用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

1809.000000