什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 或 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2019-07-07.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. 发布于 2019-07-07.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
105 W
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更高的时钟速度
左右 6% 更好的时钟速度
3.6 GHz
更多的核心数量
4 more cores
8
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 5 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.4 GHz
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
AMD Ryzen 3000
Ryzen
Desktops / Boxed Processor
3
-
Desktop / Server
Ryzen 3000 Series
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
3.8 GHz
normal
12
24
是
4.6 GHz
是
4.6 GHz
-
12x
4.2 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
None
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 和 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
是
128 GB
2
DDR4
PCIe 4.0 x16
-
-
3200
51.2 GB/s
是
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
105 W
95 °C
105 W
142 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Matisse (Zen 2)
Matisse
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
0.75 MB
6 MB
64 MB
100-100000023BOX
100-100000023MPK
100-000000023
Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
2019-07-07
AM4
TSMC 7nm FinFET
AMD-V, SVM
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 172.081997 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 269.957392 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +56.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 173.786966 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 278.940017 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +60.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 181.03671 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 276.931269 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +53.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 187.541548 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 293.268283 samples/min Submissions: 25 | +56.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 169.87457 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 261.069535 samples/min Submissions: 98 | +53.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 189.39345 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 286.258913 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +51.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.274174 samples/min Submissions: 50 | 256.303802 samples/min Submissions: 62 | +53.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.02372 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 298.893827 samples/min Submissions: 12 | +54.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.30955 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 252.424384 samples/min Submissions: 55 | +53.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.296986 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 286.20597 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +48.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.46996 samples/min Submissions: 92 | 248.369577 samples/min Submissions: 78 | +51.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.575914 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 259.472877 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +49.5 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 196.530057 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 278.652289 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +41.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 175.205341 samples/min Submissions: 120 | 269.4554 samples/min Submissions: 121 | +53.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | 13985.955304 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Duration: 715.003 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 8328.336332 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Duration: 120.072 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Lower values are better; time in seconds.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
