什么是最好的选择 AMD Epyc 7763 或 Intel Core i5-11400H? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Epyc 7763 has a base frequency of 2.45 GHz. 64 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 280 W. 发布于 Q1/2021.
Intel Core i5-11400H has a base frequency of 2.70 GHz. 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q2/2021.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
58 more cores
6
共同立场 AMD Epyc 7763 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更高的时钟速度
左右 10% 更好的时钟速度
2.45 GHz
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 29 % higher specified turbo frequency
3.50 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
280 W
共同立场 Intel Core i5-11400H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Epyc 7763
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 11000H
Intel Core i5
11
-
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
2.7 GHz
normal
6
12
是
没有
4.5 GHz
-
3.7 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
12
16
11
350 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics 11th Gen (16 EU)
1450 MHz
3
Q2/2021
128
10 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-11400H 和 AMD Epyc 7763. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
没有
128 GB
2
DDR4-3200
20
4.0
是
比较TDP的要求 AMD Epyc 7763 和 Intel Core i5-11400H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
45 W
35 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Epyc 7763 和 Intel Core i5-11400H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Tiger Lake H
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
5 MB
12 MB
Q2/2021
BGA 1787
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11400H | 4156.483283 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 6 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 240.588 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Epyc 7763 和 Intel Core i5-11400H.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
