ベストな選択とは Intel Core i5-12400F または Intel Core i7-13620H? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか？
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i7-13620H has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz (4.90 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2023.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
共通ポジション Intel Core i5-12400F 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
4 more cores
6
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
共通ポジション Intel Core i7-13620H 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i5-12400F
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Intel Core i 13000H
Intel Core i7
13
-
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
4x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
10
16
はい
いいえ
-
-
2.40 GHz (4.90 GHz)
1.80 GHz (3.60 GHz)
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 64 (Alder Lake)
12.1
64
13
400 MHz
1500 MHz
4
32 GB
Q1/2022
512
10 nm
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i7-13620H と Intel Core i5-12400F. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
はい
64 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5200LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-6400
5.0 x 28
89.6 GB/s
はい
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i5-12400F と Intel Core i7-13620H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
-
115 W
35 W
45 W
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i5-12400F と Intel Core i7-13620H, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Raptor Lake H
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
-
24 MB
Q1/2023
BGA 1744
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
502 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i7-13620H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 166.939907 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 150.069886 samples/min Submissions: 44 | -10.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 190.874304 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +12.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 157.777808 samples/min Submissions: 67 | +2.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 171.614895 samples/min Submissions: 40 | +17.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 192.304093 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -2.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 122.770066 samples/min Submissions: 54 | -15.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 176.525095 samples/min Submissions: 64 | +18.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 152.69891 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -3.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 193.702229 samples/min Submissions: 33 | +22.7 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13620H | 4854.015484 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 206.015 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 Intel Core i5-12400F と Intel Core i7-13620H.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
