ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 7 3700X または Intel Core i9-13900H? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか？
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2019-07-07.
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2023.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
6 more cores
8
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900H 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Intel Core i 13000H
Intel Core i9
-
13
Intel Core i9-12900H
Mobile
-
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
8x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
14
20
はい
-
いいえ
-
-
2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz)
1.90 GHz (4.10 GHz)
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
12.1
96
13
400 MHz
1500 MHz
4
32 GB
Q1/2022
768
10 nm
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i9-13900H と AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
いいえ
64 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5200LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-6400
5.0 x 20
-
-
-
89.6 GB/s
はい
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 7 3700X と Intel Core i9-13900H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
100 °C
-
115 W
35 W
45 W
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X と Intel Core i9-13900H, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Raptor Lake H
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
-
-
24 MB
-
-
-
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2023
BGA 1744
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
700 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-13900H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 172.660441 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 214.871098 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +24.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 188.284906 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +22.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 173.786966 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -4.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 187.541548 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +27.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 169.87457 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | +8.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 189.39345 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 180.382133 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -4.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.712665 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | +17.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.30955 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +25.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.296986 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +0.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.46996 samples/min Submissions: 92 | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | -7.9 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.575914 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +16.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 196.530057 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +31.4 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-13900H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 175.205341 samples/min Submissions: 120 | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | +21.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 8328.336332 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Duration: 120.072 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X と Intel Core i9-13900H.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
