최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 또는 Intel Core i9-13900H? 哪种处理器更快？
최고의 프로세서를 선택하는 데 도움이 되는 비교 자료를 준비했습니다. 사양과 벤치마크를 비교해 보세요.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 에 출시 2019-07-07.
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 에 출시 Q1/2023.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 더 많은 코어 수
6 more cores
8
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
공통 위치 Intel Core i9-13900H 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
Intel Core i 13000H
Intel Core i9
-
13
Intel Core i9-12900H
Mobile
-
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
8x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
14
20
예
-
아니요
-
-
2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz)
1.90 GHz (4.10 GHz)
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
12.1
96
13
400 MHz
1500 MHz
4
32 GB
Q1/2022
768
10 nm
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 Intel Core i9-13900H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
아니요
64 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5200LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-6400
5.0 x 20
-
-
-
89.6 GB/s
예
TDP 요구 사항 비교 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
100 °C
-
115 W
35 W
45 W
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900H, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Raptor Lake H
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
-
-
24 MB
-
-
-
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2023
BGA 1744
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
700 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-13900H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 172.660441 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 214.871098 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +24.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 188.284906 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +22.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 173.786966 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -4.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 187.541548 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +27.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 169.87457 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | +8.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 189.39345 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 180.382133 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -4.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.712665 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | +17.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.30955 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +25.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.296986 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +0.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.46996 samples/min Submissions: 92 | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | -7.9 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.575914 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +16.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 196.530057 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +31.4 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i9-13900H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 175.205341 samples/min Submissions: 120 | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | +21.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 8328.336332 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Duration: 120.072 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
여러 벤치마크 결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 제품 간의 성능 차이를 보다 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900H.
합성 테스트 값을 비교하여 최고의 프로세서를 선택하세요!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
