NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Differenze Specifiche Benchmark (test) Testimonianze

Differenze

Motivi da considerare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Segnala un bug

Velocità di clock più alta

Intorno a 55% migliore velocità di clock

1.98 GHz 1.275 GHz

Motivi da considerare
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Segnala un bug

Più memoria

567% più memoria

80 GB 12 GB

Specifiche

Dati tecnici

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Informazioni generali

Confronto dei dati tecnici di base delle schede grafiche NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER e NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB, chip, unità di elaborazione delle informazioni.

Architettura

Ada Lovelace Ampere
Basato su

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER -
CUDA Cores

7168 -
Shader

7168 -
Execution Units

- 6912
Chip GPU

- GA100
L1 Cache

- 192 KB
L2 Cache

- 40 MB
Unità di uscita del rendering

- 160
Unità di texture

- 432

Impostazioni di memoria

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

Memory Bus

192 bit 5120 bit
Dimensione della memoria

12 GB 80 GB
Tipo di memoria

GDDR6X HBM2e
Memory Bandwidth

- 0.255 GB/s
Memory Clock

- 1593 MHz

Frequenza di clock

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

Frequenza di base

1980 MHz 1275 MHz
Frequenza massima

2480 MHz 1410 MHz

Consumo di energia

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

Maximum GPU Temperature

90 °C -
System Power Supply

650 W (System power requirement) -
TDP

220 W 400 W

Interfacce

Connettività e collegamenti.

PCIe Interface

4.0 PCIe 4.0 x16
Max. Visualizzazioni

- 1
Power Connectors

- No

Dati tecnici

Dati tecnici utilizzati al massimo delle loro potenzialità nei giochi per computer.

CUDA

- 8.0
DirectX

- 12.2
Risoluzione massima

- 3840 × 2160
OpenCL

- 3.0

Codec video supportati

Supporto incorporato per gli standard di compressione video e immagine.

AV1

Decode / Encode -

Dimensioni

La differenza di dimensioni, peso e slot dei dispositivi a confronto

Slot Size

- IGP

Ulteriori informazioni

Confronto tra le interfacce e le date di rilascio per le GPU NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB e NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER.

Process Technology

- 7 nm
Data di rilascio

- Q3/2022

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (theoretical)

- 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1)
FP32 (theoretical)

- 19.49 TFLOPS
FP64 (theoretical)

- 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2)
Pixel Rate

- 225.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate

- 609.1 GTexel/s

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance GPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6587.517419 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6347.50887 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6523.333955 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6345.460027 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6374.879469 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6038.818647 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CUDA / Linux 3989.685291 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6304.451564 samples/min

More results: 44

Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6061.92078 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6304.215648 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6143.452036 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CUDA / Linux 4089.652043 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6428.849893 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6179.302347 samples/min
Blender 5.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows 5914.726922 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6424.735246 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows 6090.814157 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Linux 6573.099108 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows 6079.380757 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / OPTIX / Linux 6299.288762 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows 5954.512684 samples/min
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Black Myth: Wukong / 2560x1440 / Kino-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality 41.5 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Black Myth: Wukong / 3440x1440 / Kino-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality 37.9 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Black Myth: Wukong / 3840x2160 / Kino-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality 30.6 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 / 2560x1440 / Extrem-Preset / DLSS/FSR Native 77 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 / 3440x1440 / Extrem-Preset / DLSS/FSR Native 61 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 / 3840x2160 / Extrem-Preset / DLSS/FSR Native 41.4 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon Age: The Veilguard / 2560x1440 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT off 68.3 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon Age: The Veilguard / 2560x1440 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT on 55.5 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon Age: The Veilguard / 3440x1440 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT off 57 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon Age: The Veilguard / 3440x1440 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT on 43.9 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon Age: The Veilguard / 3840x2160 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT off 41.3 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon Age: The Veilguard / 3840x2160 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT on 31.2 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon's Dogma 2 / 2560x1440 / Grafik-Priorisieren-Preset / TAA Native / RT off 69.8 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon's Dogma 2 / 2560x1440 / Grafik-Priorisieren-Preset / TAA Native / RT on 63.2 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon's Dogma 2 / 3440x1440 / Grafik-Priorisieren-Preset / TAA Native / RT off 58 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon's Dogma 2 / 3440x1440 / Grafik-Priorisieren-Preset / TAA Native / RT on 53.3 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon's Dogma 2 / 3840x2160 / Grafik-Priorisieren-Preset / TAA Native / RT off 44.8 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Dragon's Dogma 2 / 3840x2160 / Grafik-Priorisieren-Preset / TAA Native / RT on 38.5 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Empire of the Ants / 2560x1440 / Hoch-Preset / TSR Ultra Quality 70.5 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Empire of the Ants / 3440x1440 / Hoch-Preset / TSR Ultra Quality 57.4 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Empire of the Ants / 3840x2160 / Hoch-Preset / TSR Ultra Quality 37.4 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / F1 24 / 2560x1440 / Ultrahoch-Preset / TAA Native / RT off 176.4 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / F1 24 / 2560x1440 / Ultrahoch-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT on 120 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / F1 24 / 3440x1440 / Ultrahoch-Preset / TAA Native / RT off 143.2 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / F1 24 / 3440x1440 / Ultrahoch-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT on 95.3 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / F1 24 / 3840x2160 / Ultrahoch-Preset / TAA Native / RT off 101 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / F1 24 / 3840x2160 / Ultrahoch-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality / RT on 66.8 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Final Fantasy XVI / 2560x1440 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality 55.3 FPS
ComputerBase GPU suite 2025 / Final Fantasy XVI / 3840x2160 / Ultra-Preset / DLSS/FSR Quality 40.5 FPS
3DMark – Time Spy — Graphics Score / DirectX 12 20671 points Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super VRAM: 12 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DOS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 12HVCI: enabledApplication version unreported
3DMark – Steel Nomad — Steel Nomad Score / DirectX 12 4617 points Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super VRAM: 12 GBOS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 12HVCI: enabledApplication version unreported

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER contro NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB. Specifiche, prestazioni, test

Differenze

Specifiche

Benchmark (test)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Schede grafiche a confronto

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB Schede grafiche a confronto

Ultimi confronti