Qual è la scelta migliore AMD Ryzen 9 7900X o Intel Core i5-12500H? Quale processore è più veloce?
Abbiamo preparato un confronto per aiutarvi a scegliere il processore migliore. Confrontate le loro specifiche e i loro benchmark.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Rilasciato in 2022-09-27.
Intel Core i5-12500H has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 12 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Rilasciato in Q1/2022.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 88% migliore velocità di clock
Velocità di clock turbo più alta
Intorno a 24% higher specified turbo frequency
Posizioni comuni AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i5-12500H CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da Intel Core i5-12500H e AMD Ryzen 9 7900X. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP AMD Ryzen 9 7900X e Intel Core i5-12500H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da AMD Ryzen 9 7900X e Intel Core i5-12500H, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Intel Core i5-12500H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | 104.793666 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -74.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 465.200088 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 149.533488 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -67.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 170.586795 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -64.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | 137.652303 samples/min Submissions: 65 | -66.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | 142.023008 samples/min Submissions: 27 | -63.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | 143.993174 samples/min Submissions: 23 | -63.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 172.389039 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -65.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | 149.547825 samples/min Submissions: 54 | -62.3 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | 140.3944 samples/min Submissions: 20 | -65.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 504.18409 samples/min Submissions: 22 | 140.320401 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -72.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | 139.293078 samples/min Submissions: 65 | -66.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12500H | 2569.472102 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 13 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / FX507ZC4 Duration: 389.185 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Sulla base dei risultati di diversi benchmark, è possibile stimare con maggiore precisione la differenza di prestazioni tra AMD Ryzen 9 7900X e Intel Core i5-12500H.
Confrontate i valori dei test sintetici e scegliete il processore migliore!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.