Qual è la scelta migliore AMD Ryzen 7 7700 o AMD Ryzen 5 9600X? Quale processore è più veloce?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Rilasciato in 2023-01-14.
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X has a base frequency of 3.9 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Rilasciato in 2024-08-08.
Motivi da considerare Più numero di core
2 more cores
Posizioni comuni AMD Ryzen 7 7700 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 3% migliore velocità di clock
Velocità di clock turbo più alta
Intorno a 2 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da AMD Ryzen 5 9600X e AMD Ryzen 7 7700. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP AMD Ryzen 7 7700 e AMD Ryzen 5 9600X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da AMD Ryzen 7 7700 e AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Shared tests with results for both models: 10
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 312.600652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 286.913281 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -8.2 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 280.843541 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 244.936665 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -12.8 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 284.160156 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 232.009849 samples/min Submissions: 22 | -18.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 285.219773 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 267.96658 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -6.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 317.664112 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 289.645554 samples/min Submissions: 174 | -8.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 261.399837 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 229.621946 samples/min Submissions: 151 | -12.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 313.81982 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 267.660228 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -14.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 258.312979 samples/min Submissions: 159 | 229.263964 samples/min Submissions: 105 | -11.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 252.067854 samples/min Submissions: 61 | 216.277421 samples/min Submissions: 42 | -14.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 254.225555 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 218.056835 samples/min Submissions: 38 | -14.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench 2024 / multi-core | 986 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench 2024 / single-core | 134 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 2630 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 341 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 6719 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 858 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 17176 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2180 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | 12206.07765 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO B650M-P (MS-7E27) Duration: 819.264 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | 9080.095523 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B850M GAMING X WIFI6E Duration: 110.131 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |