Cuál es la mejor opción AMD Ryzen 9 3950X o Intel Core i5-12400F? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Hemos preparado una comparación para ayudarte a elegir el mejor procesador. Compara sus especificaciones y puntos de referencia.
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X has a base frequency of 3.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. Publicado en 2019-07-07.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q1/2022.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
lugar
Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 40% mejor velocidad de reloj
2.50 GHz
Más número de núcleos
10 more cores
6
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 7% higher specified turbo frequency
4.40 GHz
Posiciones comunes AMD Ryzen 9 3950X CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
lugar
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
105 W
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i5-12400F CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i5
-
12
Intel Core i5-11400F
Desktop / Server
-
-
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Golden Cove
2.5 GHz
normal
6
12
Sí
-
No
4.4 GHz
-
4 GHz
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
None
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por Intel Core i5-12400F y AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
No
128 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
-
-
Sí
Compara los requisitos del TDP AMD Ryzen 9 3950X y Intel Core i5-12400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
100 °C
65 W
117 W
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por AMD Ryzen 9 3950X y Intel Core i5-12400F, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Alder Lake S
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
-
7.5 MB
18 MB
-
-
-
Q1/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
-
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 10
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | Intel Core i5-12400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 356.232453 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -52.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 349.707646 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -55.9 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 323.132971 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | -54.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 385.410161 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | -48.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 320.687592 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | -54.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 377.646335 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 197.967794 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -47.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 329.549583 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | -54.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 463.472754 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 199.716739 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -56.9 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 343.483159 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | -53.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.032225 samples/min Submissions: 45 | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | -54.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | 17352.073573 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Duration: 57.63 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Basándose en los resultados de varias pruebas comparativas, puede estimar con mayor precisión la diferencia de rendimiento entre AMD Ryzen 9 3950X y Intel Core i5-12400F.
Compare los valores de las pruebas sintéticas y elija el mejor procesador.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
