Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56

What's the best choice Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 or Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 has a maximum frequency of 1.266 GHz+ 10 %. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type HBM2. Released in Q3/2017.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 has a maximum frequency of 1.208 GHz+ 4 %. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type HBM2. Released in Q3/2017.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1284 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 5% better clock speed

    1.266 GHz+ 10 % left arrow 1.208 GHz+ 4 %

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1230 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1521 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1882 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    927 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    259 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1410 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2091 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    612 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1327 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1268 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1573 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1934 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    944 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    266 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1514 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2120 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    643 place

Specifications

Technical data
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    AMD RX Vega 56 left arrow AMD RX Vega 56
  • GPU Chip
    Vega 10 XL left arrow Vega 10 XL
  • Execution units
    56 left arrow 56
  • Shader
    3584 left arrow 3584
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    256 left arrow 256
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    HBM2 left arrow HBM2
  • Memory Speed
    0.8 GHz left arrow 0.8 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    410 GB/s left arrow 410 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    2048 bit left arrow 2048 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.266 GHz+ 10 % left arrow 1.208 GHz+ 4 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.550 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.512 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    325 W+ 55 % left arrow 280 W+ 33 %
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 92 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    1 x 80 mm left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    -- left arrow --
  • HDMI Ports
    2x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    310 mm left arrow 282 mm
  • Height
    133 mm left arrow 125 mm
  • Width
    54 mm left arrow 50 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 and Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2017
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    11276-01-40G left arrow 11276-01-40G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
11.11
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
10.84
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
3DMark Benchmark
3DMark is designed for gamers, overclockers and system builders who want to get the most out of their hardware
6996
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
6906
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
54 fps (avg)
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
53 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
31 fps (avg)
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
30 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash is an algorithm for mining Ethereum cryptocurrency that makes the most of the GPU
48 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
47 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
183 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
182 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
21 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
20 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
VertCoin cryptocurrency can be mined on both Nvidia and AMD and is interesting because it mines perfectly on old GPUs like GTX1050, R9 290 and even GTX970
0.76 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
0.75 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
-->

Latest comparisons