Select processor 1
Select processor 2
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 vs Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2016
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC

What's the best choice MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 or Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 has a maximum frequency of 1.404 GHz+ 4 %. Memory size 2 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2016.

Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC has a maximum frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2986 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3020 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2954 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2941 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2862 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 5% better clock speed

    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.404 GHz+ 4 %
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 2 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2807 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2821 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2732 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2848 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2575 place

Specifications

Technical data
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5)
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-300-A1 left arrow TU117-300-A1
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 14
  • Shader
    640 left arrow 896
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    40 left arrow 56
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    112 GB/s left arrow 128 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.404 GHz+ 4 % left arrow 1.485 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.518 GHz+ 4 % left arrow 1.725 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.665 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    1 x 90 mm left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 2x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    170 mm left arrow 145 mm
  • Height
    111 mm left arrow 99 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    317 g left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q2/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow NE51650S1BG1-1170F
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1 and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
1.94
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
3.09
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
14 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
20 fps (avg)
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
8 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 AERO ITX 2G OCV1
12 fps (avg)
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
-->

Latest comparisons