What's the best choice Intel Arc A310 Graphics or KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP? Which graphics card is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Intel Arc A310 Graphics has a base frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2022.
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP has a base frequency of 1.303 GHz+ 1 %. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2016.
Common positions Intel Arc A310 Graphics GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Intel Arc A310 Graphics and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP, chip, information processing units.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Intel Arc A310 Graphics and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP.
Connectivity and connections.
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP and Intel Arc A310 Graphics.
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Intel Arc A310 Graphics and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC LP.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.