Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2016
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
Released
Q1/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC

What's the best choice GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G or ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G has a maximum frequency of 1.316 GHz+ 2 %. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2016.

ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC has a maximum frequency of 1.500 GHz. Memory size 6 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q1/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2792 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2954 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2878 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2793 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2619 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2714 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2797 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2104 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2149 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 12% better clock speed

    1.500 GHz left arrow 1.316 GHz+ 2 %
  • More memory

    33% more memory

    6 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2255 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1942 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1948 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2164 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2197 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2039 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1774 place

Specifications

Technical data
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G and ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-400-A1 left arrow TU116-400-A1
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 24
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 1536
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 48
  • Texture Units
    48 left arrow 96
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    112 GB/s left arrow 288 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 192 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G and ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.316 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.500 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.455 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.890 GHz+ 7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.430 GHz left arrow 1.860 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 120 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G and ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 80 mm left arrow 3 x 80 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 2x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    191 mm left arrow 264 mm
  • Height
    111 mm left arrow 130 mm
  • Width
    36 mm left arrow 55 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q1/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-N105TOC-4GD left arrow TUF3-GTX1660TI-O6G-GAMING
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G and ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
2.23
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
5.81
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
17 fps (avg)
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
46 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
11 fps (avg)
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
29 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash is an algorithm for mining Ethereum cryptocurrency that makes the most of the GPU
16 MH/s
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
28 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
31 MH/s
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
57 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
6 MH/s
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
14 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
VertCoin cryptocurrency can be mined on both Nvidia and AMD and is interesting because it mines perfectly on old GPUs like GTX1050, R9 290 and even GTX970
0.2 MH/s
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4G
0.39 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
-->

Latest comparisons