Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC

GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2016
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
Released
Q1/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC

What's the best choice GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC or ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC has a maximum frequency of 1.417 GHz+ 5 %. Memory size 2 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2016.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC has a maximum frequency of 1.530 GHz. Memory size 6 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q1/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2978 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3011 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2926 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2957 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2442 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    1.530 GHz left arrow 1.417 GHz+ 5 %
  • More memory

    67% more memory

    6 GB left arrow 2 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2401 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2270 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2288 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2423 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2497 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2421 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1869 place

Specifications

Technical data
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-300-A1 left arrow TU116-300-A1
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 22
  • Shader
    640 left arrow 1408
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 48
  • Texture Units
    40 left arrow 88
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    112 GB/s left arrow 192 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 192 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.417 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.530 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.531 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.845 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.815 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 120 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 80 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    2 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    245 mm left arrow 205 mm
  • Height
    126 mm left arrow 123 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 46 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC and GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q1/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    50NPH8DVN6EC left arrow TUF-GTX1660-O6G-GAMING
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
1.96
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
5.2
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
15 fps (avg)
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
41 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
8 fps (avg)
GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 EXOC
24 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC
-->

Latest comparisons